← All comparisons
Atelier vs Serena

What Serena says, vs. what it scored.

LSP-wrapped semantic code toolkit -- symbol-level navigation and refactoring via real language servers, 40+ languages.

What Serena says about itself
“Serena provides essential semantic code retrieval, editing, refactoring and debugging tools that are akin to an IDE's capabilities, operating at the symbol level and exploiting relational structure.”
“Practically, this means that your agent operates faster, more efficiently and more reliably, especially in larger and more complex codebases.”
Publishes some numbers ...never against another search tool ~11k stars
What it actually scored — same 14 repos, same 7,213 queries as every other tool
Tool MRR p95 p100
Atelier +semantic (BGE) 0.727 390ms 1057ms
Atelier lexical (default) 0.676 134ms 319ms
Serena 0.401 3834ms 269001ms

Serena is real code intelligence, not a grep wrapper -- LSP-based symbol navigation across 40+ languages. That architecture has a cost: a cold language-server spin-up on the first query, documented in Serena's own issue tracker (oraios/serena #634 repeated LSP re-initialization, #890 an 11-hour index on a large repo, #470 gitignore-parsing hangs). It shows up directly in our numbers -- 3.8s p95, 269s p100 on the slowest query of 7,213 -- and its own MRR (0.401) trails both Atelier channels.

The true story

Every tool in this comparison, Serena included, has been through the exact same 14 repositories and 7,213 query/gold pairs that score Atelier — no cherry-picked queries, no separate corpus. Full methodology, every raw number, and the other 9 tools →